Self-improving mechanism: learning strategy-selection criteria from student model states by concept learning from examples¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The article's central mechanism account is that a tutor can improve itself by inducing selection criteria from its own experience. Criteria "are expressed as characteristics of the student model" and are "elaborated by comparing student model states recorded when a strategy was effective and those recorded when the same strategy was not effective". The comparison is performed by machine learning methods, "more precisely, by learning concepts from examples", so each tutoring episode contributes a labelled example of strategy success or failure.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Recorded student model states from episodes where a strategy was effective and where it was not effective
- Machine learning methods able to learn concepts from examples
Constraints¶
- Criteria are limited to characteristics expressible in the student model
Target Learners¶
- geometry learners
Learning Goals¶
- adaptive selection of didactic strategies during tutoring
Claims¶
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Dillenbourg, P. (1989). The design of a self-improving tutor: PROTO-TEG. Instructional Science, 18(3), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053359
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
strategy-selection-criteria-from-student-model-states |
title |
Self-improving mechanism: learning strategy-selection criteria from student model states by concept learning from examples |
description |
The article's central mechanism account is that a tutor can improve itself by inducing selection criteria from its own experience. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dillenbourg-1989 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.