Skip to content

Self-improving mechanism: learning strategy-selection criteria from student model states by concept learning from examples

Design · All designs
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The article's central mechanism account is that a tutor can improve itself by inducing selection criteria from its own experience. Criteria "are expressed as characteristics of the student model" and are "elaborated by comparing student model states recorded when a strategy was effective and those recorded when the same strategy was not effective". The comparison is performed by machine learning methods, "more precisely, by learning concepts from examples", so each tutoring episode contributes a labelled example of strategy success or failure.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Recorded student model states from episodes where a strategy was effective and where it was not effective
  • Machine learning methods able to learn concepts from examples

Constraints

  • Criteria are limited to characteristics expressible in the student model

Target Learners

  • geometry learners

Learning Goals

  • adaptive selection of didactic strategies during tutoring

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Dillenbourg, P. (1989). The design of a self-improving tutor: PROTO-TEG. Instructional Science, 18(3), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00053359
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id strategy-selection-criteria-from-student-model-states
title Self-improving mechanism: learning strategy-selection criteria from student model states by concept learning from examples
description The article's central mechanism account is that a tutor can improve itself by inducing selection criteria from its own experience.
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dillenbourg-1989

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.