Skip to content

Structured versus unstructured educational robotics curriculum comparison design for block-based programming

Design · All designs
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 1 study (1 causal), q3 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The study implements a quasi-experimental comparison of two educational robotics curricula for young learners working in block-based programming: "a structured ER curriculum group and an unstructured one". Within the quasi-experiment, "both qualitative and quantitative data are collected", covering error frequency and type, debugging ability, and engagement in the learning process.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Two comparison groups, one following a structured ER curriculum and one an unstructured ER curriculum

Constraints

  • Quasi-experimental design with two comparison groups (n = 35), not a randomized experiment

Target Learners

  • young learners in block-based programming contexts

Learning Goals

  • debugging programs
  • reducing programming errors
  • engagement in the learning process

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Chrysanthos Socratous, Andri Ioannou. (2021). Structured or unstructured educational robotics curriculum? A study of debugging in block-based programming.
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id structured-unstructured-er-curriculum-comparison
title Structured versus unstructured educational robotics curriculum comparison design for block-based programming
description The study implements a quasi-experimental comparison of two educational robotics curricula for young learners working in block-based programming: "a structured ER curriculum group and an unstructured one".
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — chrysanthos-socratous-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.