School art programs should employ working artists rather than art teachers as workshop instructors¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · 2 claims (2 mixed) · 1 study (1 causal),q2· 1 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article identifies the AP's distinguishing design feature as its use of "working artists as opposed to art teachers" in school workshops. Artists are "selected through an open competition" and "paid competitively," with the implementing partner's reputation and attractive salaries cited as explaining the capacity to "attract excellent artists to the program." This design choice is presented as the key novelty distinguishing the AP from traditional public school art education.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Competitive salaries to attract high-quality artists
- Open competition selection process for artists
- Implementing partner with sufficient reputation to attract excellent artists
Constraints¶
Target Learners¶
- high school students in public schools
Learning Goals¶
- creativity
- artistic skills
- academic achievement
Claims¶
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Pablo Egana-delSol. (2023). The impacts of a high-school art-based program on academic achievements, creativity, and creative behaviors. npj Science of Learning 8:39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00187-6
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
working-artists-rather-than-art-teachers |
title |
School art programs should employ working artists rather than art teachers as workshop instructors |
description |
The article identifies the AP's distinguishing design feature as its use of "working artists as opposed to art teachers" in school workshops. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pablo-egana-delsol-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.