Skip to content

Comparing Cases

Element · All elements
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 3 studies (2 causal, 1 quant-synthesis), q3–q4 · 1 of 3 report an effect size

Description

Comparing cases is the element in which learners inspect two or more examples, solutions, texts, or scenarios side by side in order to notice meaningful similarities, differences, and governing principles. It is useful when the goal is abstraction, discrimination, or transfer beyond a single instance.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Cases that differ in instructive ways
  • Prompts that focus attention on the important contrasts
  • A synthesis step that names the takeaway principle

Constraints

  • Too many irrelevant differences can overwhelm learners
  • Comparison without guidance may stay superficial

Target Learning Goals

  • Build conceptual understanding, pattern detection, and transfer.

Affordances

Claims

Patterns That Use This Element

Examples

  • Comparing two worked solutions to identify where one method is more efficient.
  • Studying strong and weak examples of an argument to see the role of evidence quality.

Key Sources

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 321-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016026
Page metadata
Field Value
type element
id comparing-cases
title Comparing Cases
description Comparing cases is the element in which learners inspect two or more examples, solutions, texts, or scenarios side by side in order to notice meaningful similarities, differences, and governing principles.
status review
canonical True
generated by codex/unspecified on 2026-04-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rittle-johnson-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.