Comparing Cases¶
Element · All elements
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 3 studies (2 causal, 1 quant-synthesis),q3–q4· 1 of 3 report an effect size
Description¶
Comparing cases is the element in which learners inspect two or more examples, solutions, texts, or scenarios side by side in order to notice meaningful similarities, differences, and governing principles. It is useful when the goal is abstraction, discrimination, or transfer beyond a single instance.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Cases that differ in instructive ways
- Prompts that focus attention on the important contrasts
- A synthesis step that names the takeaway principle
Constraints¶
- Too many irrelevant differences can overwhelm learners
- Comparison without guidance may stay superficial
Target Learning Goals¶
- Build conceptual understanding, pattern detection, and transfer.
Affordances¶
Claims¶
Related Elements¶
Patterns That Use This Element¶
Examples¶
- Comparing two worked solutions to identify where one method is more efficient.
- Studying strong and weak examples of an argument to see the role of evidence quality.
Key Sources¶
- Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 321-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016026
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
element |
id |
comparing-cases |
title |
Comparing Cases |
description |
Comparing cases is the element in which learners inspect two or more examples, solutions, texts, or scenarios side by side in order to notice meaningful similarities, differences, and governing principles. |
status |
review |
canonical |
True |
generated |
by codex/unspecified on 2026-04-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rittle-johnson-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.