Six adapted GenAI ethical scenarios for assessing scenario-based ethical judgment¶
Product or Programme · All products and programmes
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 associational),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
A six-item scenario-based assessment adapted from Dodson et al. (2025) that measures undergraduate students’ ethical judgments about learning-support and substitutionary uses of generative AI in academic contexts.
Components¶
Claims¶
- Undergraduate students classify common GenAI ethical scenarios with high accuracy, with a pronounced ceiling effect [+M]
- Students distinguish learning-support GenAI uses from substitutionary uses, with uncertainty highest for minimally modified AI content [+M]
Related Products and Programmes¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Reed, J. M., Ferdig, R. E., Dodson, T. M., Gunstad, J., & Hughes, J. W. (2026). AI Literacy and Scenario-based Ethical Judgment About Generative AI Among Undergraduate Students. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09757-w
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
product |
id |
six-adapted-genai-ethical-scenarios-for-assessing-scenario-based-ethical-judgment |
title |
Six adapted GenAI ethical scenarios for assessing scenario-based ethical judgment |
description |
A six-item scenario-based assessment adapted from Dodson et al. |
status |
review |
product_kind |
assessment |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.