Three-level RTI prevention model for identifying learning disabilities¶
Product or Programme · All products and programmes
Evidence · 2 claims (1 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 quant-synthesis),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
A response-to-intervention framework that organizes general instruction, targeted tutoring, and special education evaluation around students' measured progress and responsiveness.
Components¶
- Three-tier RTI model for primary-grade reading: Tier 1 core instruction, Tier 2 supplemental intervention, Tier 3 intensive intervention: The article describes RTI for early reading as a schoolwide, multitiered prevention framework in which "students are provided with evidence-based classroom reading instruction and supplemental intervention when it is needed, and decisions related to intervention are based on student assessment data." Tier 1 is evidence-based core classroom instruction with universal screening; Tier 2 is supplemental intervention for at-risk students; Tier 3 is more intensive intervention for inadequate responders. Progress is monitored with repeated curriculum-based measures, and teacher professional development supports fidelity. (Denton Carolyn A (2012))
- The Three Tier (RTI/MTSS) model as a data-informed tiered support framework in which screening is one component of broader placement decisions: The Three Tier model (also called MTSS with three tiers or a three-tier RTI model) is a prevention-oriented framework providing universal Tier 1 instruction, targeted Tier 2 supplemental interventions, and intensive, individualized Tier 3 support. The review emphasizes that "universal screening is not intended to serve as a definitive placement mechanism into Tiers 1, 2, or 3"; instead, screening is an initial risk-identification step within a dynamic process combining teacher judgment, contextual information, and response to intervention. The review synthesizes the validity of the screening tools that feed this process. (Keles et al. (2025))
Claims¶
- Screening tools in the Three Tier model show a moderate pooled correlation with academic achievement outcomes (r = .51), with very high heterogeneity [+M]
- Very few studies (18 of 127) provide validity data for screening tools used in tier assignment, and none test whether screening itself improves achievement [~M]
Related Products and Programmes¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Powell, S. R., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007). Grade One: Math Computation (Math Case Study #1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED502453
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
product |
id |
three-level-rti-prevention-model-for-identifying-learning-disabilities |
title |
Three-level RTI prevention model for identifying learning disabilities |
description |
A response-to-intervention framework that organizes general instruction, targeted tutoring, and special education evaluation around students' measured progress and responsiveness. |
status |
review |
moved_from |
theory/three-level-rti-prevention-model-case-study |
product_kind |
framework |
generated |
by process:sweep-kinds on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — powell-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.