Brier-score decomposition into calibration, resolution, and knowledge as metrics of detection metacognition¶
Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 causal),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article uses probability judgments to reveal metacognitive states of mind, scoring them with the Brier score, which "can be decomposed into three components, calibration (or reliability), resolution, and knowledge (or uncertainty)." Calibration measures whether confidence judgments correspond to relative frequencies; resolution measures the variance of correct answers associated with different probability judgments, so high-resolution individuals "are better able to discriminate between correct and incorrect judgments by assigning them different probabilities." Judgments are binned into six confidence ranges (50–59% through 100%), with lower calibration scores and higher resolution scores indicating better metacognition; knowledge, capturing outcome uncertainty, is excluded as not an element of metacognition.
Accounts¶
- Brier-score decomposition into calibration, resolution, and knowledge as metrics of detection metacognition: The article uses probability judgments to reveal metacognitive states of mind, scoring them with the Brier score, which "can be decomposed into three components, calibration (or reliability), resolution, and knowledge (or uncertainty)." Calibration measures whether confidence judgments correspond to relative frequencies; resolution measures the variance of correct answers associated with different probability judgments, so high-resolution individuals "are better able to discriminate between correct and incorrect judgments by assigning them different probabilities." Judgments are binned into six confidence ranges (50–59% through 100%), with lower calibration scores and higher resolution scores indicating better metacognition; knowledge, capturing outcome uncertainty, is excluded as not an element of metacognition. (Casey Inez Canfield et al. (2019))
Claims¶
- Email-detection confidence judgments show good calibration but poor resolution, with aggregate overconfidence of 18% [+M]
- Calibration is worse and resolution better for phishing emails than for legitimate emails [+M]
Related Research Methods¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Casey Inez Canfield & Baruch Fischhoff & Alex Davis. (2019). Better beware: comparing metacognition for phishing and legitimate emails. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09197-5
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
research-method |
id |
brier-score-decomposition-into-calibration-resolution-and-knowledge-as-metrics-of-detectio |
title |
Brier-score decomposition into calibration, resolution, and knowledge as metrics of detection metacognition |
description |
The article uses probability judgments to reveal metacognitive states of mind, scoring them with the Brier score, which "can be decomposed into three components, calibration (or reliability), resolution, and knowledge (or uncertainty)." Calibration measures whether confidence judgments correspond to |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.