Skip to content

Framework of reliability and validity evidence categories for classifying RCR outcome-measure validation

Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 review), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The review develops a coding framework distinguishing forms of reliability evidence (test–retest, parallel forms, split-half, internal consistency via Cronbach's alpha or Kuder–Richardson formulas) and validity evidence (content validity including cognitive interviews and S-CVIs, face validity, criterion validity, construct validity). It extends the framework of Fenn et al. (2020) with additional categories such as "Global Content Validity Indices (S-CVIs)". The framework was applied so that each measure was coded independently by one reviewer and checked by a second, documenting only explicitly reported evidence.

Accounts

  • Framework of reliability and validity evidence categories for classifying RCR outcome-measure validation: The review develops a coding framework distinguishing forms of reliability evidence (test–retest, parallel forms, split-half, internal consistency via Cronbach's alpha or Kuder–Richardson formulas) and validity evidence (content validity including cognitive interviews and S-CVIs, face validity, criterion validity, construct validity). It extends the framework of Fenn et al. (2020) with additional categories such as "Global Content Validity Indices (S-CVIs)". The framework was applied so that each measure was coded independently by one reviewer and checked by a second, documenting only explicitly reported evidence. (M. van Loon et al. (2026))

Claims

-

Key Sources

  • M. van Loon, D. Crean, M. van den Hoven, J. Katsarov, N. Evans. (2026). How is the Impact of Responsible Conduct of Research Education Evaluated? A Review of Measures Used and a Content Analysis of Outcome Measures with Reported Validation Evidence. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10187-8
Page metadata
Field Value
type research-method
id framework-of-reliability-and-validity-evidence-categories-for-classifying-rcr-outcome-meas
title Framework of reliability and validity evidence categories for classifying RCR outcome-measure validation
description The review develops a coding framework distinguishing forms of reliability evidence (test–retest, parallel forms, split-half, internal consistency via Cronbach's alpha or Kuder–Richardson formulas) and validity evidence (content validity including cognitive interviews and S-CVIs, face validity, crit
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.