Misleading-versus-facilitating task paradigm for assessing effective complexity¶
Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The article distinguishes misleading tasks, which activate mutually incompatible schemes competing for application (e.g., dual-task paradigms and backward span tasks), from facilitating tasks solvable with habitual automatised schemes, such as standard forward span tasks. Misleading situations "can assess effective complexity reliably — whereas facilitating situations, common in learning/memory paradigms and psychometric-intelligence tasks, do not". Effective complexity is indexed by the number of effortfully activated task-relevant schemes required, and these situations show developmental performance discontinuities subtending stages.
Accounts¶
- Misleading versus facilitating tasks: misleading situations reliably assess effective complexity of mental attention: The article distinguishes misleading tasks, which activate mutually incompatible schemes competing for application (e.g., dual-task paradigms and backward span tasks), from facilitating tasks solvable with habitual automatised schemes, such as standard forward span tasks. Misleading situations "can assess effective complexity reliably — whereas facilitating situations, common in learning/memory paradigms and psychometric-intelligence tasks, do not". Effective complexity is indexed by the number of effortfully activated task-relevant schemes required, and these situations show developmental performance discontinuities subtending stages. (Arsalidou et al. (2016))
Claims¶
Related Research Methods¶
Key Sources¶
- Arsalidou, M. & Pascual-Leone, J. (2016). Constructivist developmental theory is needed in developmental neuroscience. npj Science of Learning 1, 16016. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.16
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
research-method |
id |
misleading-versus-facilitating-task-paradigm-for-assessing-effective-complexity |
title |
Misleading-versus-facilitating task paradigm for assessing effective complexity |
description |
The article distinguishes misleading tasks, which activate mutually incompatible schemes competing for application (e.g., dual-task paradigms and backward span tasks), from facilitating tasks solvable with habitual automatised schemes, such as standard forward span tasks. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.