Nelson and Stolterman's typology of design judgment operationalized for instructional design practice¶
Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 qualitative),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study
Description¶
This framework conceptualizes design judgment as the ability to gain subconscious insights abstracted from experience and reflection in complex, indeterminate situations, and identifies multiple forms of judgment exercised across design situations. The article operationalizes the types for ID as a coding framework: "framing, deliberated off hand, default, core, instrumental, appearance, appreciative, connective, compositional, navigational, and quality." Table 1 defines each type with sample actions in the ID process, and the framework was extended as new actions were identified in interview data.
Accounts¶
- Nelson and Stolterman's typology of design judgment, operationalized for instructional design practice: This framework conceptualizes design judgment as the ability to gain subconscious insights abstracted from experience and reflection in complex, indeterminate situations, and identifies multiple forms of judgment exercised across design situations. The article operationalizes the types for ID as a coding framework: "framing, deliberated off hand, default, core, instrumental, appearance, appreciative, connective, compositional, navigational, and quality." Table 1 defines each type with sample actions in the ID process, and the framework was extended as new actions were identified in interview data. (Muruvvet Demiral-Uzan (2024))
Claims¶
Related Research Methods¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Muruvvet Demiral-Uzan, Elizabeth Boling. (2024). Instructional design students’ design judgment development. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10361-1
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
research-method |
id |
nelson-and-stoltermans-typology-of-design-judgment-operationalized-for-instructional-desig |
title |
Nelson and Stolterman's typology of design judgment operationalized for instructional design practice |
description |
This framework conceptualizes design judgment as the ability to gain subconscious insights abstracted from experience and reflection in complex, indeterminate situations, and identifies multiple forms of judgment exercised across design situations. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.