Skip to content

Subgroup responder-rate analysis for judging practical significance

Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · no claims cited

Description

The article recommends that responder rates be presented for different subgroups of students. It argues "Such a presentation would better reflect that most effects are heterogeneous (Bryan et al., 2021) and would allow stakeholders to judge if findings are of practical significance to their specific target group." This extends the responder-rate communication strategy to heterogeneous effects.

Accounts

  • Present responder rates for different subgroups so stakeholders can judge practical significance for their specific target group: The article recommends that responder rates be presented for different subgroups of students. It argues "Such a presentation would better reflect that most effects are heterogeneous (Bryan et al., 2021) and would allow stakeholders to judge if findings are of practical significance to their specific target group." This extends the responder-rate communication strategy to heterogeneous effects. (Zitzmann et al. (2023))

Claims

-

Key Sources

  • Zitzmann, S., Machts, N., Hübner, N., Schauber, S., Möller, J., & Lindner, C. (2023). The Yet Underestimated Importance of Communicating Findings from Educational Trials to Teachers, Schools, School Authorities, or Policy Makers (Comment on Brady et al. (2023)). Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09776-8
Page metadata
Field Value
type research-method
id subgroup-responder-rate-analysis-for-judging-practical-significance
title Subgroup responder-rate analysis for judging practical significance
description The article recommends that responder rates be presented for different subgroups of students.
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.