Provide self-assessment feedback and SRLTS-based task-selection advice to secondary school students¶
Strategy · All strategies
Evidence · 6 claims (3 for, 3 mixed) · 2 studies (1 review, 1 associational),q2· 1 of 2 report an effect size · 6 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The article recommends that students "might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice", with feedback on self-assessments and advice that uses "the paths from the model as a basis for the advice". Advice should focus on using self-assessments for choosing difficulty levels, support levels, and content, and early guidance could include more explicit instructions while later guidance phases out and alerts students to use self-assessment information.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Task databases with a clear distinction between contents, difficulty levels and support levels
- Instructions for students on how to select these three factors through self-assessments
Constraints¶
- The article notes providing task-selection advice might even hamper the learning of task-selection skills, citing prior mixed results
Target Learners¶
- secondary school students
Target Learning Goals¶
- accurate self-assessment
- appropriate learning-task selection
Affordances¶
Claims¶
- Students' actual task selections deviate about half a difficulty level and half a support level from SRLTS model-based selections [+W]
- Secondary school students overestimate their performance on learning tasks by about one step out of five [+W]
- Secondary school students selecting tasks without guidance base most selections on content and rarely on difficulty or support level [+W]
- Self-assessment accuracy and estimated performance change do not improve over repeated task selections within a single session [~W]
- Judgments of learning add no new self-assessment information beyond performance estimates for single tasks [~W]
- Students' expertise on the task may be an important prerequisite for accurate self-assessment [~W]
Related Strategies¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Nugteren, M. L., Jarodzka, H., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018). Self-regulation of secondary school students: self-assessments are inaccurate and insufficiently used for learning-task selection. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9448-2
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
strategy |
id |
srlts-based-self-assessment-feedback-and-task-selection-advice |
title |
Provide self-assessment feedback and SRLTS-based task-selection advice to secondary school students |
description |
The article recommends that students "might benefit from self-assessment and task-selection advice", with feedback on self-assessments and advice that uses "the paths from the model as a basis for the advice". |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nugteren-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.