Theories

Research-based design: edtech products should derive their purpose, framework, and design decisions from learning sciences research

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 4 studies (2 associational, 1 review, 1 design), q1–q2 · 0 of 4 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

Research-based design is the organizing account of this report: edtech quality is judged by whether a product articulates a learning purpose and explicitly consults learning sciences research to drive design decisions, from a theoretical framework down to specific features. The report argues this is a more timely and generalizable quality metric than efficacy studies, which take years and generalize poorly. It claims that products using this approach "more clearly name the expected impact on learning" and can track progress toward a research-based goal.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

Constraints

Target Learners

Target Learning Objectives

Claims

Examples

Key Sources

Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title Research-based design: edtech products should derive their purpose, framework, and design decisions from learning sciences research
description Research-based design is the organizing account of this report: edtech quality is judged by whether a product articulates a learning purpose and explicitly consults learning sciences research to drive design decisions...
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-nostrand-p-noakes-s

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.