Rightful Presence

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 qualitative), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

Rightful presence (Calabrese Barton & Tan) describes legitimate membership in a learning community grounded in who a person is, not who they are expected to become — and crucially, membership that carries the power to reshape the community's own norms, rather than requiring the newcomer to conform to norms set by others. It is distinct from mere access or inclusion: a learner can be present in a STEM space without being able to shift what counts as belonging there. Originally developed around racialized and other collective identities, the framework has been extended to learners whose identities are fluid or intersecting rather than anchored in a single, stable community category (e.g., queer youth navigating both STEM identity and sexual/gender identity at once) — for these learners, rightful presence additionally requires spaces that permit self-authorship of identity labels and resist forcing binary categorization.

Implications

Context

• Most relevant in STEM spaces (classrooms, makerspaces, camps) serving learners whose identities are marginalized, fluid, or intersecting in ways that don't map onto the space's existing norms
• Distinguishes genuine belonging from superficial "inclusion" that still requires the learner to assimilate

Target Learners

• Learners whose identity(ies) put them at odds with dominant assumptions about who belongs in STEM

Target Learning Objectives

• Supporting STEM engagement and identity development as mutually reinforcing, rather than requiring learners to compartmentalize or choose between them

Claims

• Identity-centered making supports simultaneous STEM engagement and identity affirmation for queer youth [+M]

Related Theories

• Self-Determination Theory — rightful presence's emphasis on authored, non-conditional belonging overlaps with self-determination theory's relatedness and autonomy conditions
• Person-Centered Psychology — both frameworks hold that unconditional acceptance (not acceptance contingent on conforming) is what allows genuine engagement and vulnerability
• Inclusion versus rightful presence: a four-dimension contrast (rights, time, burden, culture)
• Rightful presence in education systems: a framework for building equity and justice at the systems level
• DEIB framework: diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging as interdependent foundations of collaborative learning

Examples

• Identity-Centered E-Textile Making — a maker pattern designed around rightful presence for queer youth
• Shared power: previously excluded students, families, and communities co-create and shape educational systems, policies, and practices
• Presume the rightful presence and inherent value of disenfranchised students, families, and communities from the start

Key Sources

• Tofel-Grehl, C., Hawkman, A. M., Feldon, D. F., Suárez, M. I., MacDonald, B. M., & Searle, K. (2024). "I can be the weird STEM kid who is also gay": Queer rightful presence in STEM making. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 33(4-5), 799-842. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2409101
• Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2019). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of "rightful presence" for guiding justice-oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 48(6), 433-440.

Page metadata

Field	Value
type	theory
title	Rightful Presence
description	Rightful presence holds that equitable STEM learning spaces require treating marginalized learners as legitimate members with the power to reshape community norms, not just guests granted conditional access.
status	review
canonical	True
generated	by claude/unspecified on 2026-08-29
trust	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources	1 — tofel-grehl-et-al-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.