Skip to content

State education agency LRE policies cluster around three goals: influencing out-of-district placement, controlling institutional programs, and deinstitutionalization

Theory · All theories
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 qualitative), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The report organizes the state policies it surveyed into a three-goal taxonomy. It states that despite wide variation, most SEA policies "are directed toward one of the followingthree goals: influencing the process by which handicappedChildren are placed out of district:gaining greater control over the educational programs of children placedi.n State institutions; and participating iii effortsto deinStitUtiohalize handicapped Children." Each goal is illustrated with named state examples: Connecticut and Maryland for placement review, Louisiana, Florida, and California for institutional programs, and Colorado for deinstitutionalization.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • SEAs must work through other jurisdictions (LEAs, IEUs, and state human service agencies) because they lack direct supervision of most handicapped children

Constraints

  • An SEA's ability to issue specific policies varies from state to state according to the strength of the SEA, its relation to local districts, historical patterns of care, and how each state interprets LRE

Target Learners

  • Handicapped children educated by LEAs, intermediate education units, and state human service agencies

Target Learning Objectives

  • Education in the least restrictive environment statewide

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Farrow, Frank, and Cheryl Rogers. (1983). Policies Which Address Out-of-District Placements and Assure Education in the Least Restrictive Environment. A Report of the Handicapped Public Policy Analysis Project, Volume 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED245469
Page metadata
Field Value
type theory
title State education agency LRE policies cluster around three goals: influencing out-of-district placement, controlling institutional programs, and deinstitutionalization
description The report organizes the state policies it surveyed into a three-goal taxonomy.
status review
canonical True
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — farrow-1983

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.