Auditory thalamic and cortical input to BLA interneurons is concentrated in the LA: thalamic EPSCs are larger in LA than BA interneurons (191 vs 53 pA, p < 0.0001)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Direct thalamic (AT) input reaches ~91% of LA interneurons but 67% of BA interneurons, and AT-evoked EPSCs are significantly smaller in BA (53 ± 14 pA) than LA (191 ± 18 pA; p < 0.0001). → Polepalli 2020
q3 i? Cortical (AC) input innervates 85% of LA but only 38% of BA interneurons; individual AC input amplitude does not differ between nuclei (p = 0.5888). → Polepalli 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Polepalli 2020¶
Polepalli, J. S., Gooch, H. & Sah, P. (2020). Diversity of interneurons in the lateral and basal amygdala. npj Science of Learning 5:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0071-z
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Optogenetic (ChR2) stimulation of AT afferents in acute slices from GAD67-GFP mice; BA AT-EPSC peak 53 ± 14 pA vs LA 191 ± 18 pA, p < 0.0001. "and it was significantly smaller (peak amplitude: 53 ± 14 pA; p < 0.0001)". No standardised effect size printed.
"In the BA, 67% (12/18) of interneurons received AT input (Fig. 3a) and it was significantly smaller (peak amplitude: 53 ± 14 pA; p < 0.0001) as compared to interneurons in the LA"
Polepalli 2020 (2)¶
Polepalli, J. S., Gooch, H. & Sah, P. (2020). Diversity of interneurons in the lateral and basal amygdala. npj Science of Learning 5:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-0071-z
q3 · i? · causal · r2
ChR2 stimulation of TeA cortical afferents in the same slice preparations; only 38% of BA interneurons (6/16) received AC input, with non-significant amplitude difference to LA (p = 0.5888). "input to individual cells (127 ± 50 pA) was not significantly different".
"AC input to BA interneurons was also sparse with 38% of cells (6/16; Fig. 3b) being innervated, but input to individual cells (127 ± 50 pA) was not significantly different to that in the LA ( p = 0.5888)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Thalamic input to accommodating (ACC) LA interneurons is significantly larger than cortical input to the same subtype — related
- Auditory input drives feed-forward inhibition onto LA interneurons, with cortical input producing a smaller E/I ratio than thalamic input — related
- NMDAR subunit stoichiometry differs between LA and BA interneurons: LA NMDAR EPSCs decay faster and LA interneurons include a GluN2A-dominant majority plus NMDAR-lacking cells, absent in the BA — related
- Glutamatergic synapses on BA interneurons are less rectifying than those on LA interneurons, indicating fewer calcium-permeable GluR2-lacking AMPARs in the BA — related
- Long-term potentiation at cortical inputs is restricted to LA interneurons and cannot be induced in BA interneurons — related
- Experimental work indicates basolateral amygdala cells activated by appetitive CSs mainly encode behavioural output, not CS identity, challenging amygdalo-centric feedforward accounts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
auditory-input-concentrated-in-la-interneurons |
title |
Auditory thalamic and cortical input to BLA interneurons is concentrated in the LA: thalamic EPSCs are larger in LA than BA interneurons (191 vs 53 pA, p < 0.0001) |
description |
Auditory thalamic and cortical input to BLA interneurons is concentrated in the LA: thalamic EPSCs are larger in LA than BA interneurons (191 vs 53 pA, p < 0.0001) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — polepalli-2020, polepalli-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.