Discovery learning strategies produce significant achievement gains in English grammar for standard V learners compared with conventional methods¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test achievement mean scores in English grammar after discovery learning instruction. → Singaravelu 2012
q2 i? The control group showed a significant difference between its post-test and its second post-test after receiving the discovery learning treatment. → Singaravelu 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Singaravelu 2012¶
Singaravelu, G. (2012). Discovery Learning Strategies in English. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 2 No. 1, January - March 2012. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070208
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Rotational group experimental study with 30 experimental-group pupils of standard V; pre-test mean 57.43 (S.D. 5.07) and post-test mean 86.76 (S.D. 6.72), with the calculated 't' value (19.08) greater than table value (2.00).
"In Table 2, the calculated 't' value is (19.08) greater than table value (2.00). Hence null hypothesis is rejected at 0.05 levels."
Singaravelu 2012 (2)¶
Singaravelu, G. (2012). Discovery Learning Strategies in English. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 2 No. 1, January - March 2012. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1070208
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Comparison of the control group's post-test (mean 57.43, S.D. 5.07) with its second post-test after the discovery learning treatment (mean 79.86, S.D. 5.87), with 30 pupils per stage and 't' value (15.83).
"In Table 3, the calculated 't' value is (15.83) greater than table value (2.00). Hence null hypothesis is rejected at 0.05 levels."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Conventional grammar teaching produced no significant pre-to-post change in the control group — related
- The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching — related
- Control groups taught conventionally showed no significant pre-to-post gain in English grammar achievement in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School — related
- Experimental groups showed significant pre-to-post gains in English grammar achievement after gadget-based learning in Shri Vani Vilas Middle School — related
- Experimental groups showed significant pre-to-post gains in English grammar achievement after gadget-based learning in Gopala Samudram Middle School — related
- Gadget Based Learning is more effective than conventional method in learning English grammar at standard II in both an aided and a government school — related
- Co-operative learning produces significantly higher English grammar achievement than conventional methods in secondary students — related
- Standard V pupils show low pre-test achievement in English grammar under conventional methods relative to the experimental group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.