Students who use the ePSRL Management System meet the course completion deadline at a significantly higher rate than non-users¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The proportion of participants meeting the course completion deadline was significantly higher among system users (88.2%) than non-users (70.9%). → Khiat 2022
Evidence¶
Khiat 2022¶
Khiat, H., & Vogel, S. (2022). A self-regulated learning management system: Enhancing performance, motivation and reflection in learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.4
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Chi-square test of independence comparing course completion deadline attainment between the 76 intervention and 79 control students, significant at "χ2 (df = 1) = 7.053, p = 0.008 < 0.05"; attainment rates were 88.2% versus 70.9%. No effect size was printed.
"The course completion deadline between the participants who used the ePSRL Management System and those who did not was statistically significant, χ2 (df = 1) = 7.053, p = 0.008 < 0.05. This showed that course deadline attainment varied as a function of the group type."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who use the ePSRL Management System spend more time learning per month and complete the course in fewer months than non-users — related
- Only the 200740F high-use group showed a significantly higher rate of good academic standing compared to non-visitors — related
- Using the ePSRL Management System increases postgraduate online students' perceived awareness, understanding and application of self-regulated learning — related
- Using the ePSRL Management System shows no significant difference in mean assessment results or mean attempts per quiz between users and non-users — related
- Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice — related
- Adoption intent does not differ significantly across teacher prior-practice groups, with every cohort exceeding 65% willingness to continue using LearnLens — related
- Randomized A/B tests of interventions encouraging higher-level study increased lessons completed per level by more than 10% and increased overall studying activity — related
- Students who use the ePSRL Management System post more scaffold reflections and self-reflections per month than non-users — related
- Commitment devices such as deadlines show demand but mixed effectiveness for student performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
epsrl-higher-course-completion-deadline-rate |
title |
Students who use the ePSRL Management System meet the course completion deadline at a significantly higher rate than non-users |
description |
Students who use the ePSRL Management System meet the course completion deadline at a significantly higher rate than non-users |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — khiat-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.