Using the ePSRL Management System shows no significant difference in mean assessment results or mean attempts per quiz between users and non-users¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? There was no significant difference in mean assessment result between students who used the system and those who did not. → Khiat 2022 q2 i? There was no significant difference in mean attempts per quiz between students who used the system and those who did not. → Khiat 2022 (2)

Evidence¶

Khiat 2022¶

Khiat, H., & Vogel, S. (2022). A self-regulated learning management system: Enhancing performance, motivation and reflection in learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.4

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Mann–Whitney U comparison of mean summative assessment scores between the 76 intervention and 79 control students. The test "was not significant with U = 805.500 and p = 0.542 > 0.05"; no effect size was printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"The Mann–Whitney U test was not significant with U = 805.500 and p = 0.542 > 0.05. Thus, there was no significant difference in the mean assessment result between participants who used the ePSRL Management System and those who did not."

Khiat 2022 (2)¶

Khiat, H., & Vogel, S. (2022). A self-regulated learning management system: Enhancing performance, motivation and reflection in learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.19.2.4

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Mann–Whitney U comparison of mean attempts per quiz (students had up to six attempts per summative assessment) between intervention and control students. The test "was not significant with U = 821.000 and p = 0.612 > 0.05"; no effect size was printed.

"The Mann–Whitney U test was not significant with U = 821.000 and p = 0.612 > 0.05. Thus, there was no significant difference in the mean attempts per quiz between participants who used the ePSRL Management System and those who did not."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Using the ePSRL Management System increases postgraduate online students' perceived awareness, understanding and application of self-regulated learning — related
• Students who use the ePSRL Management System meet the course completion deadline at a significantly higher rate than non-users — related
• Students who use the ePSRL Management System post more scaffold reflections and self-reflections per month than non-users — related
• Students who use the ePSRL Management System spend more time learning per month and complete the course in fewer months than non-users — related
• Learning paths used for SRL improved accuracy and performance without increasing effort, and tutoring-system benefits required sustained practice — related
• In eSpark quests requiring three post-quiz attempts, students reached the 80 percent mastery criterion only 14 percent of the time — related