Claims

Experimental-group students rated the Every Circuit system highly enjoyable, with all nine responses between 7 and 9 on a 1-10 scale

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 9 responses on a 1-10 enjoyment scale, 3 students ranked it a 7, 3 ranked it an 8, and 3 ranked it a 9. → Gryczka et al. 2016

Evidence

Gryczka et al. 2016

Patrick Gryczka, Edward Klementowicz, Chappel Sharrock, Jin Kim Montclare. (2016). Interactive Online Physics Labs Increase High School Students' Interest. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.191

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-lesson survey of the 9 experimental-group students rating enjoyment of the online system on a 1-10 scale, with 1 the least and 10 the most enjoyable. Descriptive ratings only; no statistical analysis is printed.

"Out of a total of 9 responses, 3 of the students ranked it a 7, 3 of the students ranked it an 8, and 3 of the students ranked it a 9"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.