Claims

Four dimensions characterize students' meaning making of immersive VR experiences across all eight reflective group dialogues

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pattern analysis across all eight groups identified four prominent dimensions of students' talk about their VR experiences: feeling of taking part in conversations, attending to bodily expressions of others, students' own bodily responses, and teacher guidance. → Kenneth Silseth 2024

Evidence

Kenneth Silseth 2024

Kenneth Silseth, Rolf Steier, Hans Christian Arnseth. (2024). Exploring students’ immersive VR experiences as resources for collaborative meaning making and learning. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09413-0

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

The interaction analysis of transcribed reflective dialogues used a review of the full corpus to identify recurring themes, then analyzed longer sequences in detail. The authors state they "identified four prominent dimensions that occurred across all groups" in how students characterized their meaning making.

"Looking for patterns across all eight groups, we identified four prominent dimensions that occurred across all groups in the way students talked about their experiences and characterized their meaning making: (1) the feeling of taking part"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id four-dimensions-of-vr-meaning-making
title Four dimensions characterize students' meaning making of immersive VR experiences across all eight reflective group dialogues
description Four dimensions characterize students' meaning making of immersive VR experiences across all eight reflective group dialogues
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kenneth-silseth-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.