Claims

The experimental and control groups were statistically equivalent on the academic achievement pre-test before the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-test scores did not differ significantly between groups (t = 1.6, p = 0.11), supporting group comparability. → Coşkun and Eker 2018

Evidence

Coşkun and Eker 2018

İsmail Coşkun, Cevat Eker. (2018). The Effect of Teaching Activities Done by Using Activity Based Posters on the Students' Academic Achievements, Retention Levels in Their Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060402

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t test on pre-test scores of 30 experimental and 30 control ninth graders; Table 5 prints means of 9.63 and 8.03, t = 1.6, p = 0.11. The article concludes the groups were "similar in terms of academic achievement scores before the experiment".

"At the end of pre-testing of the groups, t test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between the scores obtained and it was found that there was no statistically significant difference with the value obtained [p <0.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.