Claims

Students in a LinkedIn group community scored significantly higher on engagement than control group students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Experimental group students scored significantly higher on engagement (M = 4.525, SD = 0.488) than control group students (M = 4.190, SD = 0.908), t(80) = -2.062, p = 0.042. → Hazzam 2024

Evidence

Hazzam 2024

Hazzam, J., Wilkins, S., Southall, C., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). The influence of LinkedIn group community on postgraduate student experience, satisfaction and grades. Computers & Education, 216, 105052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105052

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent sample t-test comparing 40 experimental and 42 control postgraduate students on the PTES engagement dimension after a 12-week LinkedIn group intervention. The "experiment group (M = 4.525, SD = 0.488)" scored significantly higher than controls.

"the results highlight that the experiment group (M = 4.525, SD = 0.488), t(80) =-2.062, p = 0.042 scored significantly higher than the control group (M = 4.190, SD = 0.908) on engagement"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.