Claims

LinkedIn group community did not significantly affect teaching and learning perception, community, or skills development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Independent t-tests show no statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups on teaching and learning (p = 0.589), community (p = 0.750), or skills development (p = 0.214). → Hazzam 2024

Evidence

Hazzam 2024

Hazzam, J., Wilkins, S., Southall, C., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). The influence of LinkedIn group community on postgraduate student experience, satisfaction and grades. Computers & Education, 216, 105052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105052

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Independent sample t-tests on PTES dimensions of teaching and learning, community, and skills development. "the experiment group (M = 4.537, SD = 0.634), t(80) =-0.542, p = 0.589 did not have statistically higher scores on teaching and learning than the control group."

"the experiment group (M = 4.537, SD = 0.634), t(80) =-0.542, p = 0.589 did not have statistically higher scores on teaching and learning than the control group (M = 4.464, SD = 0.588)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.