Claims

Students in a LinkedIn group community achieved significantly higher grades than control group students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Experimental group students scored significantly higher on grades (M = 60.423, SD = 13.555) than control group students (M = 48.928, SD = 12.424), t(92) = -4.241, p < 0.001; ANCOVA controlling for attendance and LMS duration confirmed the difference (F = 13.111, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.127). → Hazzam 2024

Evidence

Hazzam 2024

Hazzam, J., Wilkins, S., Southall, C., & Ibrahim, B. (2024). The influence of LinkedIn group community on postgraduate student experience, satisfaction and grades. Computers & Education, 216, 105052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105052

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Independent sample t-test on grades among 40 experimental and 42 control students. The "experiment group (M = 60.423, SD = 13.555)" scored significantly higher than controls. ANCOVA confirmed the difference remained significant (F = 13.111, p < 0.001, partial eta squared = 0.127).

"the experiment group (M = 60.423, SD = 13.555), t(92) =-4.241, p < 0.001 scored significantly higher than the control group (M = 48.928, SD = 12.424) on grades"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.