Claims

No significant difference was found in drawing-skill acquisition between male and female students taught with two- and three-dimensional visual objects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive comparison of male and female post-treatment drawing scores showed no significant difference (male three-dimensional mean 11.2500; female three-dimensional mean 10.6000; male two-dimensional 10.7000; female two-dimensional 9.6500). → Abass et al. 2014

Evidence

Abass et al. 2014

Bada Tayo Abass, Bello Isyakka, Ijisakin Yemi Olaolu & Fajuyigbe Michael Olusegun. (2014). Effects of Two and Three-Dimensional Visual Objects on the Acquisition of Drawing Skills among JSS1 Students in Osun State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n1p62

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive analysis (Table 7) of post-treatment drawing scores by gender within the two experimental groups (n = 20 per sex per treatment, 80 total). The article reports the comparison as showing no significant difference; no effect size or test statistic is printed in this section.

"This shows that there is no significant difference in the acquisition of drawing skills between male and female students who were taught using two dimensional and three-dimensional visual objects."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.