Claims

Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use both significantly predict behavioral intention to use m-learning apps outside the classroom

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Behavioral intention is significantly predicted by perceived usefulness (β = 0.56, p < 0.001) and perceived ease of use (β = 0.42, p < 0.001), and PEOU also predicts PU (β = 0.13, p < 0.05). → Chenxi Liu 2025

Evidence

Chenxi Liu 2025

Chenxi Liu, Ana-Paula Correia, Young Min Kim. (2025). Determining mobile learning acceptance outside the classroom: an integrated acceptance model. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10514-w

q3 · i? · associational · r2

SEM path analysis of the 639 valid responses supports H2 (PU→BI) and H3 (PEOU→BI); the PEOU→PU path (β = 0.13, p < 0.05, H1) appears in the companion structural-results quote. Attitude was excluded from the instrument based on prior studies.

"Lastly, BI is related to PU and PEOU (β = 0.56, p < 0.001; β = 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.