Claims

No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught with the demonstration method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test mean achievement scores did not differ significantly between males and females taught using demonstration method; Ho4 was accepted. → Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Evidence

Efe M. Omwirhiren 2016

Efe M. Omwirhiren, Khalil U. Ibrahim. (2016). The Effects of Two Teachers' Instructional Methods on Students' Learning Outcomes in Chemistry in Selected Senior Secondary School in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103149

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Gender comparison within the demonstration condition (25 males, mean 52.52; 25 females, mean 51.96). The article reports t cal = 0.177 < t crit = 0.861 and F cal = 0.728 < F crit = 0.781, accepting Ho4; equivalence was not separately tested.

"From the results obtained, it can be seen that t here is no significant difference in the post-test mean achievement scores between males and females taught using demonstration method. Based on this result, the null hypothesis is accepted."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.