Claims

No significant difference in listening performance between male and female students taught with suggestopedia

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Posttest listening scores did not differ significantly by gender (male M=46.90 versus female M=50.65), so the null hypothesis of no gender difference was retained. → Muhammad Ali Mustapha 2018

Evidence

Muhammad Ali Mustapha 2018

Muhammad Ali Mustapha. (2018). Use of Suggestopedia to Improve Students’ Listening Skill in English Language. i-manager’s Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 8 No. 4. https://www.i-manager.com/journals/journal_of_english_language_teaching

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Gender comparison within the same quasi-experiment, reported in Table 2. The article states the two-tailed P-value equals (P= >0.38) and that "this difference is not scientifically significant", so the null hypothesis was retained at the 0.05 level; no effect size is printed.

"the mean score of male group regarding listening ability in posttest was (M=46.90, SD=17.701) while that of their female counterparts was (M=50.65, SD=20.607)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.