Skip to content

Argumentation-based group activity pattern for teaching a mathematics unit

Design · All designs
Evidence · 3 claims (3 for) · 1 study (1 causal), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study

Description

The pattern organizes a mathematics unit as repeated small-group argumentation activities: the class is divided into small groups that work through researcher-prepared activities, defend claims in group discussion, and share defended claims with the whole class. As printed, "the experiment group was divided into seven groups totally as 6 groups of four each and 1 group of six each and they dealt with the activities prepared by argumentation method throughout the function subject and did 9 activities totally during the practice". Students who doubted a claim tried to confute it by raising a new claim, with constant teacher interaction.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Activities prepared in advance for argumentation
  • small groups of about four to six students
  • classroom time for discussion and whole-class sharing of claims

Constraints

  • The article states "This study is limited to 9th-grade students and "Functions" subject" and notes generalization would require larger samples

Target Learners

  • 9th-grade high school mathematics students

Learning Goals

  • science process skills
  • attitude toward mathematics
  • conceptual understanding of functions
  • willingness for argumentation

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Emel Mercan, Tevfik İşleyen. (2017). Analyzing the Efficiency of Argumentation Based Practices on 9th Grade Functions Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(7). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050716
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id argumentation-group-activity-pattern-functions
title Argumentation-based group activity pattern for teaching a mathematics unit
description The pattern organizes a mathematics unit as repeated small-group argumentation activities: the class is divided into small groups that work through researcher-prepared activities, defend claims in group discussion, an...
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — emel-mercan-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.