Assessment without examinations: weight moved to in-class exercises, reflective writing, and a defended team project that resist unattributed automation¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · 1 claim (1 mixed) · 1 study (1 design),q1· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study
Description¶
This pattern rebuilds grading around tasks a language model cannot quietly ghost-write, on the bet that "an assessment a model can silently complete is a weak assessment." The Spring 2026 grade comprised in-class exercises done in the room in a fixed hour (20 percent), weekly projects that may be reflection, programming, or a mix (40 percent), and a team project (40 percent), with no midterm or final. Reflective writing carries a first-person account of the student's own process, and in-class exercises were graded complete-or-incomplete on submission with AI scores advisory only.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- In-class exercises require a fixed scheduled hour in the room and produce an artifact on the spot
- Reflective writing must be required to be in the student's own voice
Constraints¶
- The author's own students, asked to design fair grading for such a course, mostly reinvented proctored or handwritten assessment, the strongest internal challenge to this structure
- The author makes no causal or learning-outcome claims for the structure
Target Learners¶
- upper-division undergraduate computer science students
Learning Goals¶
- artificial intelligence fundamentals
- engineering judgment and supervision of AI tools
- reflective practice
Claims¶
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Yusuf Pisan. (2026). Teaching Intro AI When the Tools Can Do the Homework: A Course Redesign and a Student Bill of Rights. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05175
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
assessment-resisting-unattributed-automation |
title |
Assessment without examinations: weight moved to in-class exercises, reflective writing, and a defended team project that resist unattributed automation |
description |
This pattern rebuilds grading around tasks a language model cannot quietly ghost-write, on the bet that "an assessment a model can silently complete is a weak assessment." The Spring 2026 grade comprised in-class exer... |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yusuf-pisan-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.