Three forms of noticing required for learning to facilitate productive discussion¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · 3 claims (2 for, 1 mixed) · 1 study (1 causal),q2· 1 of 1 report an effect size · 3 claims rest on one study
Description¶
Building on Gibson's perceptual learning theory, the article proposes three forms of noticing for teachers developing discussion facilitation. "First is increased differentiation with respect to the structure and features of student talk, including both what is present and what is missing." Second, differentiation of the features and dimensions of teachers' response moves; third, identification and refinement of one's values and commitments and of alignment between a discussion and those values. The intervention was designed around these three areas.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Requires teachers to encounter varied discussion examples that make features of student talk, teacher moves, and values contrasts salient
Constraints¶
- The matching-problem analogy is acknowledged as a simplification; discussion also occurs in social and cultural contexts shaped by values and relational histories the analogy does not capture
Target Learners¶
- preservice teachers
- prospective teachers (undergraduates interested in teaching)
Learning Goals¶
- noticing features of productive classroom discussion
- differentiating talk moves such as revoicing
- refining values and commitments about discussion
Claims¶
- Preservice teachers became more likely to notice the absence of students building on each other's ideas and marginally more likely to notice open-ended questions [+M]
- Student-focused noticing marginally increased (Cohen's d = 0.43) while teacher-focused codes showed no change (d = 0.06) [~M]
- All participant pairs ranked the fully student-led Dialog E best, and disagreement about the elaborative-revoicing Dialog B reflected differences in values rather than in noticing [+W] — supports treating values as a distinct third form of noticing
Patterns Used¶
- Contrasting Cases: varied discussion transcripts are set side by side so the three forms of noticing (student talk, teacher moves, values) become perceptually salient
Related Designs¶
- Contrasting cases with a synthesis task to develop perceptual differentiation of discussion features — the intervention built on these three forms of noticing
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Blair, K. P., Banes, L. C., & Martin, L. (2024). Fostering noticing of classroom discussion features through analysis of contrasting cases. Instructional Science, 52:417–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09661-z
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
blair2024-three-forms-discussion-noticing |
title |
Three forms of noticing required for learning to facilitate productive discussion |
description |
Building on Gibson's perceptual learning theory, the article proposes three forms of noticing for teachers developing discussion facilitation. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — blair-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.