Four-stage CASP-based sequence: lecture with worked examples, individual RCT analysis, instructor feedback, then collaborative group evaluation¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 design),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
A lesson/unit-level instructional pattern for teaching critical appraisal of clinical trials. The article's abstract describes "four stages: 1) introducing principles and providing example RCT evaluations, 2) assigning individual students the RCT analysis tasks, 3) instructor feedback, and 4) collaborative group assignments for new drug evaluations using CASP." Performance was evaluated with a rubric across individual and group work, and the sequence culminates in teamwork mirroring real-world pharmacy evaluation scenarios.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Instructors provide constructive feedback on individual work before group tasks
- A scoring rubric with defined criteria is devised in the preparation phase
- Students re-evaluate new clinical studies individually after feedback
Constraints¶
- The article notes that in larger classrooms, instructors would need feedback mechanisms tailored to the class size
Target Learners¶
- fifth-year pharmacy students
Learning Goals¶
- evaluating randomized controlled trials
- critical thinking
- problem-solving
- applying evidence in medication evaluation
Claims¶
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Nawanopparatsakul, S., Watana, S., Taesotikul, T., Phuagphong, P., & Chinpaisal, C. (2024). Development of Skills for Pharmacy Students in Evaluating Randomized Controlled Trials Using CASP Checklist. Proceedings of ICRES 2024 -- International Conference on Research in Education and Science. https://www.icres.net
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
casp-four-stage-rct-evaluation-sequence |
title |
Four-stage CASP-based sequence: lecture with worked examples, individual RCT analysis, instructor feedback, then collaborative group evaluation |
description |
A lesson/unit-level instructional pattern for teaching critical appraisal of clinical trials. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nawanopparatsakul-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.