Skip to content

Four-stage CASP-based sequence: lecture with worked examples, individual RCT analysis, instructor feedback, then collaborative group evaluation

Design · All designs
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 design), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

A lesson/unit-level instructional pattern for teaching critical appraisal of clinical trials. The article's abstract describes "four stages: 1) introducing principles and providing example RCT evaluations, 2) assigning individual students the RCT analysis tasks, 3) instructor feedback, and 4) collaborative group assignments for new drug evaluations using CASP." Performance was evaluated with a rubric across individual and group work, and the sequence culminates in teamwork mirroring real-world pharmacy evaluation scenarios.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Instructors provide constructive feedback on individual work before group tasks
  • A scoring rubric with defined criteria is devised in the preparation phase
  • Students re-evaluate new clinical studies individually after feedback

Constraints

  • The article notes that in larger classrooms, instructors would need feedback mechanisms tailored to the class size

Target Learners

  • fifth-year pharmacy students

Learning Goals

  • evaluating randomized controlled trials
  • critical thinking
  • problem-solving
  • applying evidence in medication evaluation

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Nawanopparatsakul, S., Watana, S., Taesotikul, T., Phuagphong, P., & Chinpaisal, C. (2024). Development of Skills for Pharmacy Students in Evaluating Randomized Controlled Trials Using CASP Checklist. Proceedings of ICRES 2024 -- International Conference on Research in Education and Science. https://www.icres.net
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id casp-four-stage-rct-evaluation-sequence
title Four-stage CASP-based sequence: lecture with worked examples, individual RCT analysis, instructor feedback, then collaborative group evaluation
description A lesson/unit-level instructional pattern for teaching critical appraisal of clinical trials.
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nawanopparatsakul-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.