Four AI-generated short teaching videos for a management course¶
Design · All designs
Evidence · 2 claims (2 against) · 2 studies (1 causal, 1 associational),q2–q3· 0 of 2 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study
Description¶
The study's materials are "four short teaching videos for a management course" developed with generative AI tools, compared against human-generated videos on the same subjects. Each video served as a treatment unit in the online experiment, with participants rating learning experiences after each video and completing a multiple-choice exam at the end.
Design Implications¶
Context¶
Requirements¶
- Generative AI tools were used to develop the videos
Constraints¶
Target Learners¶
- participants in a management course
Learning Goals¶
- management course content knowledge
Claims¶
- Students oppose preferring AI videos over instructor-recorded videos and distrust AI video information as much as human-presented information [-W]
- Human-made teaching videos produce a statistically significant but small advantage over AI-generated videos in participants' learning experience ratings [-W]
Related Designs¶
Examples¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Netland, Torbjörn; von Dzengelevski, Oliver; Tesch, Katalin. (2025). Comparing human-made and AI-generated teaching videos: An experimental study on learning effects. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105164
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
design |
id |
four-ai-generated-teaching-videos-management-course |
title |
Four AI-generated short teaching videos for a management course |
description |
The study's materials are "four short teaching videos for a management course" developed with generative AI tools, compared against human-generated videos on the same subjects. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-30 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — netland-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.