Skip to content

HERO-QA pipeline: hierarchical retrieval, answer generation with abstention, and a structured-output LLM judge

Design · All designs
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 associational), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

HERO-QA is the audit pipeline the article uses to generate and compare answers grounded in different institutional handbooks. The article states it "uses hierarchical BM25 (Robertson & Zaragoza, 2009) and dense retrieval (Xiao et al., 2024) with reranking, or the full extracted text for short handbooks (≤80,000 characters)." Qwen3-32B generates answers at temperature 0.1 and can return NOT ADDRESSED when evidence is insufficient; a Qwen3-32B judge with structured JSON output assigns a relationship label (ABSENT, CONSISTENT, COMPLEMENTARY, DIVERGENT, CONTRADICTORY), a divergence topic, and a low/medium/high significance rating.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Retrieval quality and sufficient handbook text; the judge supplies labels, divergence topics, and significance ratings for disagreements

Constraints

  • The article states these ratings describe potential consequences inferred by the model, not observed patient harm, and do not establish clinical correctness; generation and judging use the same model family

Target Learners

  • health-IT teams auditing patient-facing generative AI systems

Learning Goals

  • measuring coverage and disagreement across institutional patient-education corpora before AI deployment

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Yubo Li, Rema Padman, Ramayya Krishnan. (2026). Auditing Institutional Heterogeneity for Generative AI in Patient Education: A Large-Scale Study of 102 US Transplant Handbooks. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22606
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id hero-qa-audit-pipeline
title HERO-QA pipeline: hierarchical retrieval, answer generation with abstention, and a structured-output LLM judge
description HERO-QA is the audit pipeline the article uses to generate and compare answers grounded in different institutional handbooks.
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yubo-li-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.