Skip to content

Polya's four-stage problem solving strategy as an instructional approach for higher order thinking in mathematics

Design · All designs
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 1 study (1 causal), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study

Description

The article operationalizes problem solving strategy as Polya's (1973) four stages: "(1) understand the problem, (2) devise a plan, (3) carry out the plan, and (4) look back", with NCTM indicators such as identifying known and required elements, formulating mathematical models, applying strategies, and interpreting results against the original problem. In the study, partner teachers taught the experimental group with this strategy on system of linear equations material. The article treats it as the more effective alternative to the scientific approach for HOTS outcomes.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Teachers implement the four Polya stages with their NCTM indicators in mathematics lessons

Constraints

  • Effectiveness evidence comes from a quasi-experiment in 10th-grade linear equations in Medan, Indonesia, not from randomized assignment

Target Learners

  • 10th-grade high school mathematics students

Learning Goals

  • mathematical communication
  • mathematical creativity
  • problem solving
  • mathematical reasoning

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Hardi Tambunan. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students' Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id polya-four-stage-problem-solving-strategy
title Polya's four-stage problem solving strategy as an instructional approach for higher order thinking in mathematics
description The article operationalizes problem solving strategy as Polya's (1973) four stages: "(1) understand the problem, (2) devise a plan, (3) carry out the plan, and (4) look back", with NCTM indicators such as identifying...
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hardi-tambunan-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.