Skip to content

Handouts/Online Guides/Visual Reading Aids

Principle · All principles
Evidence · 18 claims (9 for, 7 mixed, 2 against) · 33 studies (12 causal, 10 quant-synthesis, 7 review, 2 theoretical, 1 associational, 1 qualitative), q1–q4 · 9 of 33 report an effect size · 9 claims rest on one study

Conditional relationship

This page owns the supplied reading aid as an artifact: the printed handout, the online guide page or the visual sheet that a teacher, trainer or designer hands to learners to use beside a text, lecture, video or task. It decides what goes on the aid, what the reader is asked to do with it, what format it takes, and when it is withdrawn.

For a reader who cannot yet tell what matters in a dense or unfamiliar text or task (a novice on this material, whatever their general reading level), an aid that (a) marks the few essential points, (b) shows how the parts are organized, (c) explains unfamiliar terms beside where they occur, and (d) asks the reader to do something with it (fill a gap, answer a "why" prompt, complete an organizer) is expected to improve comprehension and recall of that material (immediate-performance, conceptual-understanding) over the same material without the aid. Whether the gain lasts (delayed-retention) or carries to reading new texts without the aid (far-transfer) is a separate question this page cannot settle.

The relationship is conditional on four things. What the reader already knows: cues and organizers that help a novice can add load for a reader who already sees the structure. What the aid points at: readers learn what is marked, whether or not it matters, so a wrongly chosen emphasis teaches the wrong thing. What is on the aid besides the essentials: decoration and interesting extras cost learning. What the reader does with it: an aid only read is weaker than one the reader completes or explains.

What the evidence tests, and what it does not. No claim in this wiki tests a handout, online reading guide or visual reading aid as a whole against the same text without one. Claims test the components one at a time: cues that mark the essential material (meta-analyses), guided notes (a meta-analysis read from its abstract and one quasi-experiment), concept maps and pictures added to text (meta-analyses), glosses for second-language readers (one review citation and one experiment), and prompts to self-explain (meta-analyses). The default design below assembles those components and labels each step with its evidence status.

How the converted neighbours sit beside this page: Signaling holds the cue itself (headings, bold, arrows, colour links) and its dose; Graphic Organizers holds the diagram form and who builds it; Note-Taking holds guided notes as a note-taking support during a lecture; Annotating holds marks the learner makes on the text; Dual Coding holds pairing words with a picture; Clear Structure holds making an organization explicit in general; Accessible Vocabulary & Syntax holds the wording; Scaffolding and Fading holds withdrawing support. This page does not repeat those models; it says how to put their parts on one sheet or page a learner keeps, and how to use and retire it.

Default design, while the relationship is untested

A concrete default a designer can act on and revise. The whole-aid design is an untested proposal; each step's evidence status is stated beside it.

  1. Decide what the reading is for, then what the reader must find. Write the task in one line at the top of the aid ("Read to find the three causes and how they connect"; "Read to fill in the blanks, then answer the two questions"). Pick the three to seven points the task needs; leave the rest of the text unmarked. Untested proposal; from the earlier page ("alignment to the reading task").
  2. Mark only those points, and mark the structure. Use headings or numbered sections that follow the text's own organization, and bold or a margin arrow only for the essential terms and claims. Cues that mark the essential material help learning on average: Signaling Improves Learning [+S] (meta-analyses of multimedia lessons; the hub table counts 7 distinct studies behind it). But readers learn whatever is marked, including low-relevance material: Relevancy of emphasized text directs attention and influences test performance [~M] (67 college freshmen, underlined text; its table counts 5 distinct studies). Check every mark against the task in step 1.
  3. Group the content into a few labelled chunks. Put the essential points into three to five labelled groups rather than a long list. Chunking reduces working memory load by grouping information into fewer, more meaningful units. [+S] (memory research; its table counts 4 distinct studies; a chunk helps only if it is meaningful to the reader). The number of groups is an untested proposal.
  4. Where the content has a definite structure, add one diagram of it. A sequence, a hierarchy, a comparison or a cause-and-effect chain goes in a simple node-and-link or table form beside the text; a picture of a process or object goes next to the words that explain it. Graphic Organizers Support Novice Comprehension [+S] (concept-map meta-analyses, Grade 4 to postsecondary; studying a provided map gave a smaller benefit than building one, against different comparisons). Adding relevant pictures or graphics to text improves learning from it, with a small pooled effect on reading comprehension, though whether dual coding explains the benefit is disputed [+S] (39 experiments, elementary school to adults). How to choose the form is in Graphic Organizers.
  5. Gloss unfamiliar terms beside where they occur. Give a short meaning in the margin or on hover, in the reader's first language where the reader is learning in a second, with a picture where the term names something visible. For second-language vocabulary: Earlier meta-analyses, as reported second-hand, find that glosses improve L2 vocabulary learning and that text-and-picture glosses outperform single-mode glosses [+M] (a review citing earlier meta-analyses; outcome is vocabulary, not comprehension). For other readers, an untested proposal.
  6. Leave gaps for the reader to fill, and ask one or two "why" questions. In a lecture or video guide, give an outline with blanks for key terms and points; at the end of each section, one prompt asking the reader to explain why a step follows or how two parts connect. Guided-note handouts produced more accurate notes and better course performance: Guided Notes Improve Note Accuracy [+S] (a meta-analysis read from its abstract, mostly school-age; one quasi-experiment with 65 undergraduates, including a delayed posttest). Prompting learners to explain improves understanding on immediate tests: Prompting learners to self-explain improves understanding and problem solving on immediate tests by a moderate average amount, with little evidence yet on delayed or classroom gains. [+S] (meta-analyses; prompts on specific steps, not global summaries). Combining the two on one aid is an untested proposal.
  7. Cut everything else. No decorative images, clip art, background patterns, extra "fun facts" or sidebars that the task does not need; keep generous spacing and readable type. Coherence Principle Irrelevant Material Hurts Learning [-S] (laboratory and meta-analytic evidence on adding interesting but irrelevant material; its table counts 11 distinct studies). Legibility, contrast and device fit are untested here; from the earlier page ("accessible formatting").
  8. Use the aid in class, not only hand it out. Spend the first two or three minutes showing learners how the aid maps onto the text (where the headings are, what the blanks are for); close the reading with two or three minutes in which learners use the completed aid to answer one question or explain one link to a partner. Untested proposal; from the earlier page ("prompted to explain and use the guide actively").
  9. Plan its withdrawal across sessions. Default arc for a course where learners will meet many texts of the same kind: in the first two or three sessions, a full aid (marks, structure, glosses, mostly-completed outline, prompts); in the middle sessions, a partial aid (headings and prompts only; the learner marks the essential points and fills the organizer); in later sessions, a blank template the learner completes for a new text, then no aid, with the learner writing their own one-page guide. Move a learner to the next stage when their completed aid on the current text matches a reference version on the essential points (for example, at least four of five) on two consecutive texts. The stages and threshold are untested proposals; the reason to fade is that guidance which helps novices can become redundant as they gain expertise (Instructional guidance that helps novices can become redundant or counterproductive as expertise grows. [~M]). How to fade is modelled in Scaffolding and Fading.

Dose within one reading (untested proposal): one aid of one to two sides (or one scrollable page) per 20–40 minutes of reading or listening; about 2–3 minutes of orientation before, the reading itself with blanks filled as it goes, and 5 minutes at the end for the "why" prompts and one partner check.

When a condition is not met: if no one can check the completed aids, give a reference version to compare against after the learner has finished their own; if learners already find the essential points unaided on the first text, skip to the template or no aid.

Fitting the design to a situation

The three facts that most change the decision:

  • What the reader can already find unaided in this kind of material. A reader who can already pick out the main points and structure needs a template or nothing; a reader who cannot needs the full aid. If unstated, ask: given one similar text with no aid, can the learner say its three main points and how they connect?
  • What the reading is for and how it will be checked. Finding facts for a test, following a procedure, understanding an argument, or learning vocabulary call for different marks, organizers and prompts. If unstated, ask: what must the learner do with this material afterwards, with what aids, and when?
  • Who reads the aid, where, and on what. A printed sheet in class, a page on a phone, a guide shared with remote learners, a patient handout read alone at home, and a guide translated for second-language readers each need a different format. If unstated, ask: on what device or paper will learners read it, and will anyone be there to explain it?
If the brief says… Then change… Basis
Learners are advanced on this material, or already find the essential points unaided Give a blank template or headings only, or no aid; drop marks and organizers that repeat what they can already see; keep only glosses for terms they do not know Instructional guidance that helps novices can become redundant or counterproductive as expertise grows. [~M] (cognitive-load review; gives no crossover point); Signaling Improves Learning [~S] (in one eighth-grade field study, signals linking text and pictures harmed high-prior-knowledge learners)
Learners are child (primary age) Shorter aid (one side), fewer blanks (three to five per section), pictures beside the words they illustrate, and the teacher models filling the first section aloud Pictures: Adding relevant pictures or graphics to text improves learning from it, with a small pooled effect on reading comprehension, though whether dual coding explains the benefit is disputed [+S] (the meta-analysis found the effect regardless of grade level). Blanks and modelling: untested
Learners are adult in a work setting (procedures, compliance, equipment) Make the aid a job aid in the learners' own categories and order of work, usable at the task, with one step per line and the decision points marked; keep it after training rather than withdrawing it if the task is rare or errors are costly untested proposal
Learners have low literacy or low confidence in reading (adult literacy, health information for patients) Plain wording, one idea per line, a picture or icon beside each key instruction, larger type, and an oral walkthrough of the aid; check understanding by asking the reader to say or show what to do, not by a written test Pictures: Adding relevant pictures or graphics to text improves learning from it, with a small pooled effect on reading comprehension, though whether dual coding explains the benefit is disputed [+S], carried to low-literacy adults and health information it did not test separately. The rest: untested; from the earlier page's sources (Osborne 2006 on health visuals; Mellar et al. 2004 on adult literacy)
Learners read in a second language Add first-language glosses beside new terms, with a picture where the term names something visible; do not assume learners know which gloss helps them Earlier meta-analyses, as reported second-hand, find that glosses improve L2 vocabulary learning and that text-and-picture glosses outperform single-mode glosses [+M]; Proficiency moderates gloss effects: vocabulary benefits appear at Levels 2 and 3 but not Levels 1 and 4 [~M]; Learners hold positive attitudes toward glosses, but their perceptions of which gloss type works best do not match measured performance [~M] (EFL university readers; vocabulary outcome)
Goal is understanding an argument or concept, not only locating facts Replace some blanks with "why" and "how does this connect" prompts; add one organizer showing the argument's structure Prompting learners to self-explain improves understanding and problem solving on immediate tests by a moderate average amount, with little evidence yet on delayed or classroom gains. [+S] (immediate tests)
Setting is a lecture or video, postsecondary or school Use a guided-notes handout: the lecture outline with blanks for key terms and points, filled during the lecture; collect or check one section Guided Notes Improve Note Accuracy [+S] (both entries read from abstracts; no effect size)
Setting is online-self-paced, or mixed (some learners remote, some in the room, some on phones) Give one single-column online guide that reads on a phone: section headings that match the reading, short prompts, fillable blanks or a form; the same file for everyone, so remote and in-room learners work from one version; ask remote learners to submit one completed section Students in courses with guided note-taking and other active learning activities reported less difficulty with motivation and engagement after the shift online [+W] (focus groups in 28 STEM courses; self-report). Phone format and mixed mode: untested
One teacher with a large group, or scarce facilitator time (volunteers, a busy shift) Give a reference version of the completed aid to compare against after learners finish their own, and spend the teacher's time only on the one or two points most learners missed untested proposal
Time is one short session (for example 30 minutes) One aid of one side: 2 minutes orientation, 20 minutes reading and filling the aid, 5 minutes on one "why" prompt with a partner, 3 minutes comparing with the reference; no withdrawal plan, and do not claim retention untested proposal
The brief names its own routine, template, rubric or categories for the aid (a department note template, a reading-log form, a checklist) Keep it, and use its categories as the aid's headings; change only what the evidence says matters: mark fewer things, cut decoration, add one "why" prompt untested proposal
Learners will use the aid in a whole-task performance the brief wants kept whole (a presentation, a procedure on real equipment, a product for a real audience) Keep the aid as a reference beside the whole task rather than splitting the task into worksheet items; the aid lists the steps or criteria, and the learner performs the task as a whole untested proposal
The aid would hold private or sensitive material (health information, learners' own notes about themselves) The learner keeps the completed aid and decides who sees it; checks use a separate, non-personal item untested proposal
A teacher is tempted to highlight much of the text, or to ask learners to highlight as their study activity Mark only the essential points; if learners do the marking, follow it with a task that makes them use the marks (explain, answer, summarize) Highlighting shows low utility for improving learning outcomes [-M] (learner highlighting, review); In one experiment, students who generated their own underlining did not score significantly higher on tests than students given experimenter-generated underlining [~M] (one nonsignificant difference, not equivalence)
The brief wants learners to build their own organizer instead of receiving one For readers of a textbook passage, start with a provided organizer and ask learners to explain or extend it; move to building their own once the provided form is familiar Learner-constructed graphic organizers are not shown to outperform provided ones: the one direct test, with college readers, favoured provided organizers on transfer [~M]

Ten of the fifteen rows cite a claim. The rows for second-language readers, lectures, and expertise rest on claims about those learners or settings; the low-literacy and child rows carry a general picture-and-text meta-analysis to them; the online row rests on self-report; the rest are untested proposals.

Observation, state and explanation

What can be observed: the completed aid (which blanks are filled, and how), the answers to the "why" prompts, which marks the learner added or ignored, the time taken, and later answers on questions about marked and unmarked material. "Knows what matters", "relies on the guide" and "has learned the structure" are inferred states. A fully completed guided-notes sheet shows the learner copied or heard the points; it does not show they understood them.

Response Plausible explanations Observation that could change the interpretation
Blanks filled correctly, "why" prompts blank or restated The blanks were findable by matching words; the reader did not understand the link; the prompt was unclear or language was a barrier Ask the "why" question orally, or allow a diagram or example instead of a sentence.
Good answers on marked points, poor on unmarked material the task also needed The marks steered attention away from the rest; the unmarked material was harder; the task was not the one the marks served Compare with a reader given the same text with no marks, or move one mark and see whether scores follow it.
Learner ignores the aid and reads the text alone Already knows the material; the aid is hard to use on their device; the aid does not match the text Ask the learner to state the main points unaided; check the aid on the learner's device.
Fills the organizer correctly but cannot explain it Copied the structure from the text's headings; does not see why the parts relate Give the organizer with two links removed and ask the learner to restore and justify them.
Does well with the aid, poorly on a new text without it The aid carried the selection; the new text is a different genre; support was withdrawn too fast Give a blank template for a new text of the same kind before removing the aid entirely.

These rows are proposals, untested with learners as diagnostics. A probe changes what it measures, so record each one.

Evidence and qualifications

No claim in the wiki tests a handout, reading guide or visual reading aid as a whole. The claims below test its parts, each against the same material without that part.

What limits or qualifies the model:

Learners, materials and outcomes differ across these claims (multimedia lessons, lectures, concept maps, second-language vocabulary, memory tasks), so do not rank them by effect size. None measures retention of a reading aid's benefit, or independent reading after the aid is withdrawn.

The evidence by question

Further evidence, not yet read against this model

Objective and learner-valued goal

The designer's objective is usually comprehension of this material, and in the long run reading such material without the aid. Elicit separately what the learner wants from the aid: to finish the reading quickly, to have something to revise from, to follow a medical instruction correctly at home, to keep up in a second language. A learner who values a revision sheet may fill every blank and skip the prompts; one who wants to read independently may resent a full aid. Both are observations, and they decide whether the aid is withdrawn or kept as a reference.

For example, a patient given a medication handout wants to take the right dose at the right time; the clinician's objective may be that the patient understands why. A handout that marks the dose schedule with a picture serves the patient's goal; one "why" line serves the clinician's. Check the patient's goal by asking them to show what they will do, not by a quiz.

What would revise this model?

The expectation should weaken if a comparison of a complete reading aid with the same text alone, with comparable novice readers and an aligned comprehension test, showed no advantage, or showed that the gain disappeared when the aid was withdrawn and learners read a new text. If prompts on the aid add nothing beyond marks and structure, drop step 6's prompts. If learners given a full aid for several sessions read new texts less well than learners given a template from the start, the withdrawal arc is too slow. If guided notes help note accuracy but not learning, keep them as a record and stop claiming they teach. Do not protect the model by blaming every failure on a badly designed aid after the fact.

Comprehension with the aid, comprehension of a new text without it, delayed retention and independent reading habits are separate claims. The present evidence sets no number of marks, no length of aid and no withdrawal schedule.

Claims

Examples

  • Annotated handouts: Headings, callouts, examples, and margin notes help learners identify what matters during reading.
  • Digital reading guides: A course page breaks a text into sections with preview questions and interpretation prompts.
  • Visual glosses and cueing: Key vocabulary, symbols, or process markers are visually highlighted to support comprehension.
  • Structured note guides: Learners receive a partial outline or concept frame to complete while reading or listening.
  • Guide and time generative learning activities to overcome barriers to sense-making

Key Sources

  • Carlson, R., Padron, K., & Andrews, C. (2018). Evidence-based instructional strategies for adult learners: A review of the literature. Codex, 4(4), 29-47.
  • Osborne, H. (2006). Health literacy: How visuals can help tell the healthcare story. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 29(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01405110600772830
  • Mellar, H., Kambouri, M., Sanderson, M., & Pavlou, V. (2004). ICT and adult literacy, numeracy and ESOL. NRDC.
Page metadata
Field Value
type principle
id handoutsonline-guidesvisual-reading-aids
title Handouts/Online Guides/Visual Reading Aids
description For a reader who cannot yet tell what matters in a dense or unfamiliar text or task, a supplied guide that marks the essential points, shows the structure, glosses unknown terms and asks the reader to use it is expected to improve comprehension and recall over the same material without it; claims test its components (cues, guided notes, organizers, pictures, glosses), and none tests a whole handout or reading guide as such.
status review
canonical True
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — osborne-2006

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.