Estonian reflective-writing AI-feedback corpus of 2988 homework triplets from 283 students¶
Product or Programme · All products and programmes
Evidence · 4 claims (4 for) · 1 study (1 associational),q2· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study
Description¶
A restricted corpus created by Andres Karjus et al. from first-year humanities coursework, containing 2,988 reflective-essay, AI-feedback, and student-appraisal triplets with human-validated annotations.
Components¶
Claims¶
- Students found AI feedback helpful and actionable more often than not across a semester of reflective writing [+W]
- Student appraisals became more critical over the semester, with actionable-support themes falling from 67% to 43% [+W]
- Most student essays remained at a descriptive reflection level despite repeated AI feedback [+W]
- Expressed helpfulness of AI feedback showed no association with next essay reflection depth [+W]
Related Products and Programmes¶
Key Sources¶
- Andres Karjus, Janika Leoste, Tiia Õun. (2026). Student Evaluation of Repeated AI Feedback Across a Semester of Writing. arXiv:2607.16115 [cs.CY]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16115
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
product |
id |
estonian-reflective-writing-ai-feedback-corpus-of-2988-homework-triplets-from-283-students |
title |
Estonian reflective-writing AI-feedback corpus of 2988 homework triplets from 283 students |
description |
A restricted corpus created by Andres Karjus et al. |
status |
review |
product_kind |
dataset |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.