Multi-measure metacognition assessment paradigm combining MAI, confidence judgments, and trial-by-trial AUROC2¶
Product or Programme · All products and programmes
Evidence · 4 claims (3 for, 1 against) · 1 study (1 associational),q3· 0 of 1 report an effect size · 4 claims rest on one study
Description¶
A study-developed assessment paradigm by Terneusen et al. that measures metacognitive knowledge, monitoring, and sensitivity through an inventory, confidence judgments, and trial-level recognition-task ratings.
Components¶
Claims¶
- The regression model significantly predicts metacognitive sensitivity but explains a small proportion of variance (R² = 0.079) [+M]
- Higher (worse) prospective discrepancy scores predict higher metacognitive sensitivity on a memory task [+W]
- Lower (better) retrospective discrepancy scores predict higher metacognitive sensitivity on a memory task [+W]
- Self-report metacognitive knowledge (MAI subscales) does not significantly predict metacognitive sensitivity [-W]
Related Products and Programmes¶
-
Key Sources¶
- Terneusen, A., Quaedflieg, C., van Heugten, C., Ponds, R., & Winkens, I. (2024). The many facets of metacognition: comparing multiple measures of metacognition in healthy individuals. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09350-1
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
product |
id |
multi-measure-metacognition-assessment-paradigm-combining-mai-confidence-judgments-and-tri |
title |
Multi-measure metacognition assessment paradigm combining MAI, confidence judgments, and trial-by-trial AUROC2 |
description |
A study-developed assessment paradigm by Terneusen et al. |
status |
review |
product_kind |
assessment |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.