Coding framework of metacognition intervention components and instructional methods¶
Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · no claims cited
Description¶
The article develops a fine-grained coding framework for metacognition interventions, distinguishing intervention focus (primary vs. secondary focus on metacognition), four metacognition components, and six instructional methods. Components are defined temporally: "Before starting a task, children are encouraged to think about how they could approach a task or set goals for themselves" (planning), monitoring during tasks, control during tasks, and reflection after tasks. Instructional methods include informed instruction, modelling, prompts, practice, feedback, and peer activities. This framework enabled the first meta-analytic tests of which components and methods drive effectiveness.
Accounts¶
- Coding framework of metacognition intervention components and instructional methods: The article develops a fine-grained coding framework for metacognition interventions, distinguishing intervention focus (primary vs. secondary focus on metacognition), four metacognition components, and six instructional methods. Components are defined temporally: "Before starting a task, children are encouraged to think about how they could approach a task or set goals for themselves" (planning), monitoring during tasks, control during tasks, and reflection after tasks. Instructional methods include informed instruction, modelling, prompts, practice, feedback, and peer activities. This framework enabled the first meta-analytic tests of which components and methods drive effectiveness. (Janina Eberhart et al. (2024))
Claims¶
Related Research Methods¶
- Taxonomy of eight primary self-management intervention configurations
- Instructional Quality and Implementation Coding system combining Wood's contingent teaching with Meichenbaum and Biemiller's self-direction dimension
- Combined fine-grained video coding and process mining for sequential collaborative-learning analysis
Key Sources¶
- Janina Eberhart, Franziska Ingendahl, Donna Bryce. (2024). Are metacognition interventions in young children effective? Evidence from a series of meta-analyses. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09405-x
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
research-method |
id |
coding-framework-of-metacognition-intervention-components-and-instructional-methods |
title |
Coding framework of metacognition intervention components and instructional methods |
description |
The article develops a fine-grained coding framework for metacognition interventions, distinguishing intervention focus (primary vs. |
status |
review |
generated |
by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.