Skip to content

Equity-oriented research methodology

Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · 2 claims (2 for) · 1 study (1 qualitative), q2 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 2 claims rest on one study

Description

Drawing on the National Academies of Sciences 2022 report, the article frames equity-oriented research methodologically in two ways: "1) to look at differences between groups and 2) to design conditions that can enhance the performance of historically and systemically excluded groups." The report also calls for validated measures beyond just student outcomes, extending to "measures of the structural and contextual factors that shape student outcomes," including measures of teacher development, practice, and effectiveness, and measures to understand equity and inequity. The article positions DLPs as promising for supporting the design of conditions approach.

Accounts

  • Equity-oriented research methodology: two approaches and measures of structural and contextual factors: Drawing on the National Academies of Sciences 2022 report, the article frames equity-oriented research methodologically in two ways: "1) to look at differences between groups and 2) to design conditions that can enhance the performance of historically and systemically excluded groups." The report also calls for validated measures beyond just student outcomes, extending to "measures of the structural and contextual factors that shape student outcomes," including measures of teacher development, practice, and effectiveness, and measures to understand equity and inequity. The article positions DLPs as promising for supporting the design of conditions approach. (Designing for the future of research: Putting equity-relevant research into practice with )
  • Two-part epistemic shift in validating LLM-based measures of student talk: The article proposes a framework in which validation is treated as a knowledge-production practice shaped by epistemic authority. It argues "language should not be treated solely as a text-based representation, but as a situated, social, cultural, and embodied experience" requiring re-contextualization, and that youth should enter validation as epistemic authorities on their own talk, not merely subjects of expert annotation. The framework draws on epistemic agency, authority, and exclusion constructs, extending them from classroom interaction to the research process itself. (Liliana Santos-Deonizio et al. (2027))
  • Common design features of exemplary race-reimaging studies: From three exemplar race-reimaging studies (López et al. 2022 on SDT; Fong et al. 2019 on belonging; Gray et al. 2020 on utility value), the article identifies shared design features: scholars "foregrounded a variety of social-cultural-historical theories as they centered race in their inquiry", and participant selection and methods honored the POC who participated, with no White control group and mixed methods used to share participants' voices as counterstories. (Jessica T. DeCuir-Gunby · Paul A. Schutz (2024))

Claims

Key Sources

  • Pakhira, D., & Fusco, J. (2022, October). Designing for the future of research: Putting equity-relevant research into practice with scenarios and personas. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/163
Page metadata
Field Value
type research-method
id equity-oriented-research-methodology
title Equity-oriented research methodology
description Drawing on the National Academies of Sciences 2022 report, the article frames equity-oriented research methodologically in two ways: "1) to look at differences between groups and 2) to design conditions that can enhance the performance of historically and systemically excluded groups." The report al
status review
moved_from theory/nasem-equity-research-two-approaches-measures
generated by process:sweep-kinds on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pakhira-d-fusco-j

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.