Skip to content

Prospective value-conflict analysis for educational evaluation

Research Method · All research methods
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 theoretical), q1 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The article recommends that evaluators apply the value-conflict taxonomy prospectively rather than only retrospectively. As the abstract puts it: "It is suggested to use the taxonomy before starting an evaluation." Working through the six value areas and the goal/means and qualitative/quantitative distinctions beforehand makes latent dilemmas, such as anonymity vs. administrative demands, visible before commitments are made.

Accounts

  • Use the taxonomy of value conflicts before starting an evaluation: The article recommends that evaluators apply the value-conflict taxonomy prospectively rather than only retrospectively. As the abstract puts it: "It is suggested to use the taxonomy before starting an evaluation." Working through the six value areas and the goal/means and qualitative/quantitative distinctions beforehand makes latent dilemmas, such as anonymity vs. administrative demands, visible before commitments are made. (Patry et al. (2004))

Claims

-

Key Sources

  • Patry, Jean-Luc, & Gastager, Angela. (2004). Kokybės vertinimo dilemos – Dilemmas in quality assessment. The Quality of Higher Education 2004/1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ874233
Page metadata
Field Value
type research-method
id prospective-value-conflict-analysis-for-educational-evaluation
title Prospective value-conflict analysis for educational evaluation
description The article recommends that evaluators apply the value-conflict taxonomy prospectively rather than only retrospectively.
status review
moved_from principle/use-taxonomy-before-starting-evaluation
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-10-13
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patry-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.