Claims

21st CCLC elementary programs did not affect students' academic outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Participation in the elementary afterschool programs did not affect students' academic outcomes. → Susanne James-Burdumy 2007

Evidence

Susanne James-Burdumy 2007

Susanne James-Burdumy, Mark Dynarski, John Deke. (2007). When Elementary Schools Stay Open Late: Results from The National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 29, no. 4. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/journal-article-when-elementary-schools-stay-open-late-results-from-the-national-evaluation doi:10.3102/0162373707309077

q3 · i? · causal · r?

The evaluation's elementary component reports that for program students "their academic outcomes were not affected." The supplied text prints no effect size or test statistic for this null academic finding.

"their academic outcomes were not affected"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id 21st-cclc-no-effect-academic-outcomes-elementary
title 21st CCLC elementary programs did not affect students' academic outcomes
description 21st CCLC elementary programs did not affect students' academic outcomes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — susanne-james-burdumy-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.