Claims

In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-13 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The combination of grades and attendance indicators provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and additional information including test scores and measures of student grit did not further improve the prediction. → Allensworth 2018

Evidence

Allensworth 2018

Allensworth, E.M., Nagaoka, J., & Johnson, D.W. (2018). High school graduation and college readiness indicator systems: What we know, what we need to know. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://ncs.uchicago.edu/freshman-on-track-toolkit

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing Allensworth et al. (2014), a Chicago study of middle grade predictors in which "the combination of indicators of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates." Test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction. No effect sizes or accuracy percentages are printed for this finding.

"In a study of middle grade predictors of high school success in Chicago, the combination of indicators of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and additional information—including test scores and measures of student "grit"—did not further improve the prediction and thus are not necessary components of an indicator system."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id middle-grades-grades-attendance-best-prediction
title In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction
description In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2018
source_checked 2026-10-13
recheck_by 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — allensworth-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.