In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-13 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The combination of grades and attendance indicators provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and additional information including test scores and measures of student grit did not further improve the prediction. → Allensworth 2018
Evidence¶
Allensworth 2018¶
Allensworth, E.M., Nagaoka, J., & Johnson, D.W. (2018). High school graduation and college readiness indicator systems: What we know, what we need to know. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://ncs.uchicago.edu/freshman-on-track-toolkit
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Allensworth et al. (2014), a Chicago study of middle grade predictors in which "the combination of indicators of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates." Test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction. No effect sizes or accuracy percentages are printed for this finding.
"In a study of middle grade predictors of high school success in Chicago, the combination of indicators of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and additional information—including test scores and measures of student "grit"—did not further improve the prediction and thus are not necessary components of an indicator system."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Personality Traits — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Combining GPA or course failure rates with attendance provides the best prediction of high school graduation for most EL groups, while GPA plus test scores best predicts college degree attainment — related
- Ninth-grade on-track status predicts graduation more strongly than prior achievement, with a 55 percentage point gap after controls — related
- Freshman attendance below 85 percent predicts non-graduation even among students with similar grades — related
- The CRIS framework extends existing early warning systems beyond graduation and academic measures — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Facial features of negative emotions predict low rapport, but additional modalities added no predictive power — related
- Course performance indicators predict ELL graduation better than ELL-specific indicators such as proficiency level or education interruptions — related
- Ninth grade GPAs are the single most predictive indicator of high school graduation, college enrollment, and degree completion for all English Learner groups — related
- Within every student category, freshman GPA, course failures, and absences are strongly related to five-year graduation rates, with large drops per half grade point, per additional course failure, and per absence band — related
- The Freshman OnTrack indicator is more predictive of graduation than eighth-grade test scores, SES, race/ethnicity, gender, and school mobility combined, and raising it raises graduation rates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
middle-grades-grades-attendance-best-prediction |
title |
In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction |
description |
In a Chicago middle-grades study, the combination of grades and attendance provided the best prediction of high school on-track rates, and adding test scores and grit measures did not further improve prediction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
source_checked |
2026-10-13 |
recheck_by |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — allensworth-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.