Claims

No significant gender difference in biology achievement among students taught with concept mapping

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within the concept mapping experimental group, male and female students did not differ significantly in biology achievement (p = 0.766). → Sakiyo 2015

Evidence

Sakiyo 2015

Sakiyo, J. & Waziri, K. (2015). Concept mapping strategy: An effective tool for improving students' academic achievement in biology. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 1(1), 56-62. www.jeseh.net. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105286

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on post-test scores of male and female students within the concept mapping experimental group (Table 2). The article reports "no significant difference of students' academic achievement between male and female in the concept mapping group." No effect size is printed for the gender contrast, so impact is null.

"From the Table 2, there is no significant mean difference between male and female students in the experimental group. Since the computed p -value (0.766) is greater than the f -value (0.09) at 0.05 level of significant, the null hypothesis of no significant effect is accepted."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.