No significant gender difference in biology achievement among students taught with concept mapping¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Within the concept mapping experimental group, male and female students did not differ significantly in biology achievement (p = 0.766). → Sakiyo 2015
Evidence¶
Sakiyo 2015¶
Sakiyo, J. & Waziri, K. (2015). Concept mapping strategy: An effective tool for improving students' academic achievement in biology. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 1(1), 56-62. www.jeseh.net. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105286
q2 · i? · causal · r2
ANCOVA on post-test scores of male and female students within the concept mapping experimental group (Table 2). The article reports "no significant difference of students' academic achievement between male and female in the concept mapping group." No effect size is printed for the gender contrast, so impact is null.
"From the Table 2, there is no significant mean difference between male and female students in the experimental group. Since the computed p -value (0.766) is greater than the f -value (0.09) at 0.05 level of significant, the null hypothesis of no significant effect is accepted."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught basic science with concept mapping — related
- Among students taught with portfolio assessment, post-test geography performance did not differ significantly by gender — related
- No significant gender difference in mathematics achievement within the performance-assessment experimental group — related
- No significant difference in organic chemistry post-test achievement between male and female students irrespective of instructional method — related
- Male and female students taught Igbo language reading comprehension with the cloze approach do not differ significantly in achievement — related
- Male and female experimental groups did not differ significantly in reading comprehension at post-test after Telegram instruction — related
- No significant gender difference in performance among undergraduates exposed to e-learning — related
- Within the group learning treatment, female students achieved significantly higher mathematics post-test scores than male students — reports the opposite
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught with the demonstration method — related
- No significant difference in listening performance between male and female students taught with suggestopedia — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.