The article infers male students performed better than female students using WBI, although its reported gender comparison was not statistically significant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The authors infer that male students (N=26, post-test M=19.35) performed better than female students (N=22, post-test M=19.23), yet the reported t-value of .259 with Sig .797 indicates no significant difference. → Sudha and Amutha 2015
Evidence¶
Sudha and Amutha 2015¶
A. Sudha, S. Amutha. (2015). Higher Secondary Learners' Effectiveness towards Web Based Instruction (WBI) on Chemistry. Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(7). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030706
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Post-test gender comparison in the same quasi-experiment: males (N=26) M=19.35, SD 1.495; females (N=22) M=19.23, SD 1.688; t=.259, Sig .797. The article states "male students performed better than the female students" as an inference, while its own table shows a non-significant difference.
"From this it is inferred that male students performed better than the female students in using WBI for learning the topic 'Purification of Organic Compounds' in chemistry."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Achievement differences favor females over males under both teaching conditions, with a small effect — reports the opposite
- No significant gender difference in Arabic oral skills gains when both groups are taught with VTM or traditional methods — related
- Among students taught with portfolio assessment, post-test geography performance did not differ significantly by gender — related
- Gender shows no significant difference in inferring word meanings between experimental and control groups — related
- No statistically significant gender difference in chemistry achievement among students taught through computer-based simulations — related
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught Technical Drawing with PowerPoint presentation — related
- The effect of games-based instruction on algebraic expressions achievement interacted significantly with gender, favoring male students — reports the opposite
- Post-training communication skills did not differ significantly between male and female participants — related
- No statistical gender difference appeared in pre-test or comparison scores in either control group — related
- Gender has no significant main effect on gifted students' post-test achievement in the study — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.