Claims

Gender has no significant main effect on gifted students' post-test achievement in the study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male (x=80.83) and female (x=79.33) gifted students did not differ significantly in post-test achievement; the gender main effect was not significant (Table 1 Sig 0.108). → Fakolade 2010

Evidence

Fakolade 2010

Fakolade, O. A. & Adeniyi, S. A. (2010). Efficacy of Enrichment Triad and Self-Direct Models on Academic Achievement of Gifted Students in Selected Secondary Schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Special Education, Vol 25 No 1. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ890561

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same ANCOVA quasi-experiment (75 gifted students, 44 male, 31 female per Table 2). The article reports means of "(x=80.83)" for males and "(x = 79.33)" for females and states the difference is not significant; no effect size is printed.

"gender had no significant effect on participants post-test achievement scores of male gifted students in better (x=80.83) than their female counterparts (x = 79.33) this difference, is however, not significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.