Post-training communication skills did not differ significantly between male and female participants¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the post measurement on the communication skills scale, males and females showed no statistically significant difference in rank positions. → Alshurman 2017
Evidence¶
Alshurman 2017¶
Wael Mohammad Alshurman. (2017). The effects of the first part of the CoRT program for teaching thinking (BREADTH) on the development of communication skills among a sample of students from Al al-Bayt University in Jordan. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3069
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Wilcoxon W test comparing 16 males and 20 females on the post measurement; Table 2 prints average ranks of 18.41 (males) and 18.58 (females), W = 294.5, Z = -0.048, Sig. = 0.962. No effect size is printed; equivalence was not tested.
"Table 2 shows no statistically significant differences between the ranks of males and females in the post measurement on the communication skills."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Female participants exposed to goal-setting training scored significantly higher in English language post-test than male participants — related
- No significant difference in achievement between male and female students taught with the demonstration method — related
- Male and female experimental groups did not differ significantly in reading comprehension at post-test after Telegram instruction — related
- No significant difference in organic chemistry post-test achievement between male and female students irrespective of instructional method — related
- Within the brainstorming-taught experimental group, female students significantly outperformed male students on the English grammar post-test — related
- In a quasi-experiment on giving students prior topics and instructional objectives, Literature-in-English achievement did not differ significantly by gender in an ANCOVA across treatment and control students — related
- The article infers male students performed better than female students using WBI, although its reported gender comparison was not statistically significant — related
- No significant difference was found in drawing-skill acquisition between male and female students taught with two- and three-dimensional visual objects — related
- Gender has no significant main effect on gifted students' post-test achievement in the study — related
- No statistically significant post-test difference between male and female students within the Prezi experimental group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.