Claims

Post-training communication skills did not differ significantly between male and female participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the post measurement on the communication skills scale, males and females showed no statistically significant difference in rank positions. → Alshurman 2017

Evidence

Alshurman 2017

Wael Mohammad Alshurman. (2017). The effects of the first part of the CoRT program for teaching thinking (BREADTH) on the development of communication skills among a sample of students from Al al-Bayt University in Jordan. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3069

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Wilcoxon W test comparing 16 males and 20 females on the post measurement; Table 2 prints average ranks of 18.41 (males) and 18.58 (females), W = 294.5, Z = -0.048, Sig. = 0.962. No effect size is printed; equivalence was not tested.

"Table 2 shows no statistically significant differences between the ranks of males and females in the post measurement on the communication skills."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.