Claims

About 60 percent of students significantly below benchmark at BOY remained so at EOY, and improving to benchmark by MOY predicted meeting benchmark at EOY

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Roughly 60 percent of students starting the year significantly below benchmark stayed there; about 30 percent met benchmark by EOY and 16 percent moved up one level. → Mariann Lemke 2024 q2 i? Students who reached benchmark by MOY were significantly more likely to meet benchmark at EOY than students still at risk at MOY. → Mariann Lemke 2024 (2)

Evidence

Mariann Lemke 2024

Mariann Lemke, Dan Murphy, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, and Angela Acuña. (2024). Early Literacy Performance in Massachusetts: Results of Ongoing Analysis of Literacy Screening Assessments. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED663754

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Longitudinal within-year analysis tracking students' benchmark status from BOY through MOY to EOY in 2022/23, with differences by grade noted in the report.

"Overall, about 60 percent of students who started the year significantly below benchmark were still significantly below benchmark at EOY. About 30 percent of students who were significantly below benchmark at BOY met benchmark by EOY, and another 16 percent improved to the next performance level"

Mariann Lemke 2024 (2)

Mariann Lemke, Dan Murphy, Aaron Soo Ping Chow, and Angela Acuña. (2024). Early Literacy Performance in Massachusetts: Results of Ongoing Analysis of Literacy Screening Assessments. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED663754

q2 · i? · associational · r2

The report's student progress analysis compares EOY outcomes for students at benchmark at MOY versus those still classified as at risk at MOY, finding a significant difference in later benchmark attainment.

"Students who improved to the meeting benchmark level MOY were significantly more likely to meet benchmark at EOY than those who were still classified as at risk at MOY."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id within-year-risk-persistence
title About 60 percent of students significantly below benchmark at BOY remained so at EOY, and improving to benchmark by MOY predicted meeting benchmark at EOY
description About 60 percent of students significantly below benchmark at BOY remained so at EOY, and improving to benchmark by MOY predicted meeting benchmark at EOY
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mariann-lemke-2024, mariann-lemke-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.