Skip to content

Toulmin Model of Argumentation as a framework for structuring scientific argumentation in science classrooms.

Design · All designs
Evidence · 1 claim (1 for) · 1 study (1 causal), q3 · 0 of 1 report an effect size · 1 claim rests on one study

Description

The Toulmin Model of Argumentation (Toulmin, 1958) explains the basic constituents of argumentation and their functional relations. Three major constituents are grounds, warrant and claim, supported by three additional elements: backing, rebuttal and qualifiers. The model is used in many fields of study, including science courses for the analysis of discussions, and in this study all argumentation activities were based on the Toulmin model.

Design Implications

Context

Requirements

  • Activities must be structured so students present claims supported by grounds, warrants and justifications

Constraints

Target Learners

  • eighth-grade students

Learning Goals

  • scientific argumentation skills
  • understanding relationship among evidence, claims and justifications

Claims

Examples

-

Key Sources

  • Balci, C. & Yenice, N. (2016). Effects of the scientific argumentation based learning process on teaching the unit of cell division and inheritance to eighth grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 2(1), 67-84. https://www.jeseh.net
Page metadata
Field Value
type design
id toulmin-model-argumentation-framework
title Toulmin Model of Argumentation as a framework for structuring scientific argumentation in science classrooms.
description The Toulmin Model of Argumentation (Toulmin, 1958) explains the basic constituents of argumentation and their functional relations.
status review
generated by process:settle-candidates on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — balci-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.